faculty_blog_header_summer

By now, we have all seen this picture hundreds of times:

I first saw the picture when a very good and respected friend posted it with approval on his Facebook page. 

I dissented (and I still do dissent) from his approval of the picture but many of his other friends celebrated  both the sentiment expressed by the picture and the approval expressed by the one who posted it. 

What should those of us who want to be faithful and missional Christians say in such a situation?

Here are some suggestions (and I would love to get both corrections and further suggestions from the readers of this blog) –

1) The implication that Christians are not as active in ministry (to the poor, to the homeless, to the sexually trafficked, to the victims of natural disasters, etc., etc.) as they are in supporting statements opposing gay marriage should be graciously but firmly rejected.  Specific examples of active (and often costly) Christian compassion may be provided . . . so long as they are not presented in a triumphalistic manner.    We must never be trumpeting our good works in order to receive the approval of men.  On the other hand, simple truth-telling really is a virtue.

2)  The tendency that we all have to make blanket statements about groups with whom we disagree (or think we disagree) must be vigorously and constantly be resisted.  Any implication that one would never see “that many” Christians at a food bank or a homeless shelter, especially when the implication is made through a global medium like Facebook, is a slander against the millions of Christians in other parts of the world who never even heard of Chick Fil A.  I have personally and physically witnessed Christians lining up in places like Soweto and Seoul to help others who were in need and I know from other direct experience that this sort of behavior is “normal” for many Christians, whether the issue is an Indonesian tsunami or a Japanese nuclear disaster or a Palestinian family’s poverty. 

3) Unfortunately, however, we evangelical Christians do not always embody this kind of “missional resistance” to making blanket stereotypical statements.  Those of us who bear the name of the One Who claimed to be (and is) “the Way, THE TRUTH, and the Life” must set the standard of accuracy in the way we talk.  Have we ever made a statement about “Muslims?”  If so, have we been careful to make such statements only if we have demonstrably clear evidence that what we are saying really is true of ALL Muslims?  “Muslims worship Allah” is an appropriate statement for evangelical Christians to make.  “Muslims are terrorists” is not an appropriate statement for evangelical Christians to make.

4)  To move to the issue which precipitated the Chick Fil A controversy, do we ever talk about “gays”?  Do we ever talk about those who support gay marriage?  If we do, are we careful to be certain that our statements embody “missional resistance” to stereotyping?

5) I have used the word “missional” in the previous two paragraphs.  Why? Because in everything we say and in everything we do, we are responsible to God to embody, to the best of our Spirit-filled ability, what Christopher Wight has called “The Mission of God” and “The Mission of God’s People.”   God’s mission and ours is not simply to try to show that others that they are wrong when we think they are, though, of course, standing for the truth is surely an integral part of that mission.  In addition to (not in place of, but in addition to) speaking the truth, the mission of God involves Incarnation and the mission of God’s people involves incarnation.  We are to BE what we SAY about grace.  When others make blanket stereotypical statements about us, they are repeating the linguistic actions of those who verbally assaulted Jesus.  When we resist responding in kind, we are repeating His words and His ultimate redemptive deed – “Father, forgive them.”

6) Of all the characters in Scripture, the one whose sin most often crops up in my own life is Jonah:  “Lord, those Ninevites are horrible sinners and I want them to get every ounce of judgment they deserve.”  “Ah, but Jonah, you love that plant which you did not create . . . should I not love and spare the city of Nineveh?”  Even if those who support gay marriage are wrong (and I believe they are), isn’t the mission of God and the mission of God’s people to do that which most clearly embodies the loving and the sparing which God accomplished in Jesus? 

I have rarely eaten at Chick Fil A and, in the future, I expect that I will eat there no more (and no less) than before.  This is not because I do not care about the issues raised by Dan Cathay’s comments.  It is because neither support for nor repudiation of those comments will, in my judgment, facilitate the accomplishment of “the mission of God” or “the mission of God’s people."

But where will YOU be eating your fast-food lunches?  And why?


Sam Logan is Special Counsel to the President and Professor of Church History at Biblical.  He is an ordained minister of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and he is President Emeritus at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia.  In addition to his work at Biblical, he serves as International Director of the World Reformed Fellowship ( http://www.wrfnet.org).  He is married to Susan and they have two sons and two grandsons. See also http://www.biblical.edu/index.php/samuel-logan

Comments 

 
+2 #2 Samuel Logan 2012-08-11 11:06
Dave -

Thanks so much for your comments. There is no question that the Chick Fil A matter has caused more division and pain. I wish it had never happened.

I also agree with you that both sides need to listen more and talk less. However, I believe that this (listening)is a special responsibility of those of us who call ourselves Christians. Even if others make blanket stereotypical statements about us, we must never respond in kind . . . at least if we want to "image" the One whose name we bear.

On the other hand, I also believe that Christians frequently DO respond well to the pain and suffering of others and that should be recognized. The response of many Christians and churches to the tragedy that was Hurricane Katrina is just one example. Of course, Christians were not the only ones who responded well to Katrina. But the length and depth of Christian response to Katrina was far, far greater than the response to a suggestion that they have a lunch at a fast-food restaurant. And I am VERY thankful for that!
Quote
 
 
0 #1 Dave 2012-08-11 09:54
It seems to me that this Chick-Fil-A issue has only deepened the divide between Christ-followers and the LGBT community. Things prior to this weren't good and this has not helped to bring healing or understanding - from either side for the other. Both groups are guilty, in my opinion, of not willing to dialogue and listen to one another.

I do agree that we are not to go around proclaiming or advertising our good deeds, but it does seem ironic that there is a regular plea from Americas pulpits each week for volunteers to help with .....(fill in the blank, yet when Huckabee calls for an appreciation day of CFA millions show up. Maybe we are better at short term commitment rather than building relationship. Not really certain how buying a chicken sandwich helps us with loving mercy, doing justice and walking humbly with God.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Blog Mission

The purpose of this blog will be to expand the influence of our faculty, maintain contact with our graduates, and invite other friends to think with us about important biblical and theological ideas.

Biblical's Faculty

Biblical’s Faculty:

We are committed to ongoing engagement with culture and the world for the sake of our witness to the Gospel, and to continual learning from Christians in other cultural settings.

Latest Blog Entries

Written on 29 September 2014 - by R. Todd Mangum
Written on 26 September 2014 - by David Lamb
Written on 24 September 2014 - by Dr. Diane Langberg
Written on 22 September 2014 - by R. Todd Mangum
Written on 19 September 2014 - by R. Todd Mangum
Written on 22 August 2014 - by Philip Monroe
Written on 01 August 2014 - by Susan Disston
Written on 18 July 2014 - by Charles Zimmerman
Written on 11 July 2014 - by Bryan Maier
Written on 09 July 2014 - by R. Todd Mangum

Previous Blog Entries

Follow Biblical

Follow us on the following sites and receive notifications on upcoming events and blog entries:

Follow Biblical on facebookFollow Biblical on Twitterg+_64_black

Contact Admissions

800.235.4021 x146

215.368.5000 x146

215.368.4913 (fax)

 

admissions@biblical.edu

Stay Connected with Biblical

Follow us on the following sites:

Follow Biblical on facebookFollow Biblical on TwitterFollow Biblical on YouTubeg+_64_black
Or simply call us at...
800.235.4021 x146 or 215.368.5000 x146

Support Biblical by Giving

800.235.4021 x162

215.368.5000 x162

215.368.7002 (fax)

 

development@biblical.edu

Home

Site Login